A-Choice
海运价格亚甄研究院 · 2026年11月2日

百艘大船回到苏伊士,回程却还在绕好望角:欧线成本要按单向重算

9月以来逾百艘1.6万TEU以上集装箱船通过苏伊士运河,亚欧线63%运力重回红海。但部分船公司只做单向过境,回程仍绕好望角,船期节奏与附加费结构同时被打乱,欧线成本需要按航次路径重算。

百艘大船回到苏伊士,回程却还在绕好望角:欧线成本要按单向重算

劳氏日报统计的船舶跟踪数据里,有一个变化值得所有做欧洲线的货主留意:自9月初以来,已有超过100艘运力在1.6万TEU以上的集装箱船通过苏伊士运河。这个数字超过了2025年全年(8艘)与2026年前8个月的合计。进入10月后节奏更快,截至10月20日,已有15艘2万TEU以上的超大型船过境,包括达飞的CMA CGM PANTHEON(24232TEU)、中远海运的COSCO Shipping Virgo(20119TEU)和地中海航运的MSC Irina(24232TEU)。

从航线层面看,回归已经不是试探性动作。Alphaliner在9月15日至10月15日期间的调查显示,全球前十大班轮公司运营的46条远东至欧洲直航服务中,有24条重新使用红海航线,对应运力约550万TEU,占相关航线总部署运力870万TEU的63%。分方向看,远东至地中海约70%的运力已走红海,远东至北欧为58%,两者相差12个百分点。

但63%这个数字很容易被误读。它描述的是网络层面的运力分布,落到某一票货,真正的判断依据应该是这班船走哪条路、去程和回程是不是同一条路。目前仍有船公司采取单向策略:西行载货经曼德海峡、红海、苏伊士运河,回程则空载绕好望角。仍然完全绕行的,只剩长荣和以星两家。

单向过境的影响不在运费表上,而在船期上。一条亚欧线往返周期原本按绕航的13周排班,改走苏伊士可以压缩到11周甚至10周,舱位供给因此变多;但如果只有一半航次缩短,班期表的节奏就是错位的——同一服务里的船,有的早到、有的晚到,港口窗口被拉散,接驳和内陆段全部要跟着重排。这也是复航推进一个多月,欧线运价始终没有出现预期中塌陷的原因之一。

宁波航运交易所本周的数据可以佐证这种钝感:NCFI综合指数2509.4点,仅涨0.5%;欧洲航线1516.9点跌1.7%,地东1473.5点跌4.9%,地西1908.6点跌0.6%。指数在小幅回调,但船公司的账单在往另一个方向走——地中海航运自10月下旬起,对苏伊士航线的45个港口加收海盗风险附加费(PRS)与苏伊士附加费(SCS)。运价降一点、附加费补一点,货主实际支付的每箱成本变化,远小于指数显示的幅度。

对做欧洲线的货主,四季度有三件事值得现在就做。

第一,订舱确认要问到路径。不要只确认船名、航次和预计开航日,要问清这一班是双向过苏伊士还是单向,回程怎么走。同一服务里不同航次的路径可能不同,做计划时用正负三天的到港区间,比用单一日期更接近现实。

第二,报价单要拆到项目层。海运费、PRS、SCS、目的港杂费分列,特别要核对目的港是否在那45个加收港口名单内。同一条航线,鹿特丹和热那亚的费用结构可能完全不同,拿欧线均价做预算,误差最后都落在自己身上。

第三,内陆接驳的缓冲要留够。圣诞前的欧洲内陆段本来就紧,到港日不确定的情况下,铁路和卡车预约要按最晚到港日排。有色金属这类需要固定仓位和加固方案的货,尽量避开月末航次,月末船期最容易因为前序航次延误而挤在一起。

苏伊士复航是趋势,这一点没有争议。但对单票货来说,趋势只提供概率,不提供确定性。把网络恢复63%这个结论,翻译成我这票货走哪条路、附加费落在哪一项、到港日可能偏几天,才是这个季度欧线真正需要做的功课。

English Version / 英文版

A Hundred Big Ships Are Back on Suez, but Many Still Round the Cape Empty: Recalculating Europe Costs on a One-Way Basis

Vessel-tracking data compiled by Lloyd's List shows a shift that every shipper on the Europe trade should note: since early September, more than 100 containerships of 16,000 TEU and above have transited the Suez Canal. That is more than the whole of 2025, when only eight such ships made the passage, and more than the first eight months of 2026 combined. October has been faster still. By 20 October, 15 vessels above 20,000 TEU had passed through, including CMA CGM PANTHEON (24,232 TEU), COSCO Shipping Virgo (20,119 TEU) and MSC Irina (24,232 TEU).

At the service level, this is no longer a trial. An Alphaliner survey covering 15 September to 15 October found that 24 of the 46 Far East-Europe direct services operated by the ten largest carriers were again routing via the Red Sea. Those services represent about 5.5 million TEU of capacity, or 63 percent of the 8.7 million TEU deployed on the trade. By sub-trade, roughly 70 percent of Far East-Mediterranean capacity is back on the Red Sea route against 58 percent for Far East-North Europe, a gap of 12 percentage points.

That 63 percent figure is easy to misread. It describes capacity at network level. For any single shipment, the question that matters is which way this particular vessel is going, and whether the return leg follows the same path. Several carriers still run a one-way arrangement: cargo is carried westbound through Bab el-Mandeb, the Red Sea and the Suez Canal, while the ship returns empty around the Cape of Good Hope. Only Evergreen and ZIM remain fully on the Cape route.

The consequence of one-way transits shows up in schedules rather than in rate sheets. A round voyage that took 13 weeks around Africa can be compressed to 11 or even 10 weeks via Suez, which adds effective capacity. But when only half the voyages are shortened, the proforma rotation goes out of phase. Ships on the same service arrive early or late in an unpredictable pattern, berth windows spread out, and every connecting and inland leg has to be re-planned. This is part of why Europe rates have not collapsed in the way many expected after more than a month of reopening.

Ningbo Shipping Exchange data this week illustrates the same inertia. The NCFI composite edged up 0.5 percent to 2,509.4 points. The Europe index fell 1.7 percent to 1,516.9, the East Mediterranean index dropped 4.9 percent to 1,473.5 and the West Mediterranean index slipped 0.6 percent to 1,908.6. Rates are easing at the margin, but carrier invoices are moving the other way: since late October, MSC has applied a piracy risk surcharge (PRS) and a Suez Canal surcharge (SCS) at 45 ports on its Suez services. A little off the base rate and a little back on surcharges means the per-container cost a shipper actually pays moves far less than the index suggests.

For shippers on the Europe trade, three things are worth doing now rather than in December.

First, confirm the routing, not just the booking. Do not stop at vessel, voyage and ETD. Ask whether this particular voyage is a two-way Suez transit or a one-way one, and how the return leg is routed. Different voyages within the same service can differ. Plan on an arrival window of plus or minus three days rather than a single date.

Second, break the quotation down to line items. Base ocean freight, PRS, SCS and destination charges should be listed separately, and the destination should be checked against the list of 45 surcharge ports. Rotterdam and Genoa can carry quite different cost structures on the same trade lane; budgeting on a Europe average pushes the error onto your own P&L.

Third, build enough buffer into the inland leg. European inland capacity is tight ahead of Christmas even in a normal year. With arrival dates uncertain, rail and truck slots should be booked against the latest plausible arrival. For cargo that needs secured stowage and lashing plans, such as non-ferrous metals, avoid month-end sailings, which are the first to bunch up when earlier voyages run late.

The direction of travel on Suez is not in dispute. But a trend gives a probability, not a certainty, for any individual shipment. Translating "63 percent of capacity has returned" into which route my cargo takes, which surcharge line it lands on, and how many days late the arrival might be is the actual work for this quarter.

需要这条航线的运价与舱位方案?
提交起运港与目的港,10 秒获取参考运价,专人跟进未命中航线
立即询价
返回行业洞察