A-Choice
物流行业亚甄研究院 · 2026年10月29日

外盘三连涨、现货跟不动:新西兰原木进口商要先算到岸账

10月新西兰辐射松CFR报价升至132-137美元/JAS方,连续三轮上调,但日照、太仓现货跟涨乏力,期货震荡走弱。海运费反而持平在46美元/JAS方低位。到港脉冲式摆动放大价格波动,进口商要把到岸全成本和到港节奏管起来。

外盘三连涨、现货跟不动:新西兰原木进口商要先算到岸账

木联最新统计显示,10月新西兰辐射松原木外盘CFR报价区间升至132至137美元每JAS方,最低价较9月上调4美元,最高价上调3美元,外盘报价已经连续三轮上调。但国内现货市场并没有跟涨:日照港3.9米中A辐射松报830元每方,仅小幅上移;太仓港4米中A报820元每方,反而小幅回落;原木期货主力2611合约10月21日收于816.5元每方,整体震荡偏弱。外盘一涨再涨,内盘按兵不动,中间这段差额正在直接侵蚀木材进口商的利润空间。

跟不动的根子在需求。1至9月中国进口原木及锯材4043.4万立方米,同比下降4.1%;9月单月针叶原木进口约221.6万立方米,同比增加11%,到港明显集中,新西兰在进口来源中的占比继续上升。量在恢复,价却不涨,是因为终端承接力有限:8月家具类零售总额同比下降7.9%,下游工厂基本按刚需补库,谁都不愿为涨价买单。库存端同样说明问题:10月上旬辐射松原木库存约178万立方米、针叶原木整体约238万立方米,虽有小幅去化,但去化速度赶不上脉冲式的到港,港口现货始终缺乏持续上行的底气。

到港节奏的脉冲化放大了这种博弈。10月5日至11日当周,中国13港新西兰原木到船13条、约46.2万方,周环比大增58%;紧接着一周骤降38%至28.8万方。10月12日至18日实际到港11船、38.5万方,再增5%;10月19日至25日预计到港9船、34.6万方,又回落10%。到港量在30万方上下大起大落:船一集中到港,现货价格就被压下去;船一少,价格又翘头。进口商的采购与变现节奏被这种脉冲彻底打乱。

值得注意的是,海运费这次不是推手。11月上旬新西兰至中国针叶原木散货船运费为46美元每JAS方,较10月下旬环比持平,10月上旬还是48美元。也就是说,这轮成本上移主要来自木材本身的外盘报价,运费端反而处于低位平稳期。

对木材进口商和用材企业,我们建议做四件事。第一,每条船先算到岸全成本:把CFR外盘、汇率、港杂费、熏蒸检疫和滞期风险全部折进去,再对照国内现货价,倒挂明显就放缓接船,宁可让船期让步,也不接亏损货。第二,分批发货、错开到港:在到港脉冲化的背景下,避免多条船挤在同一周靠泊,人为制造价格踩踏。第三,关注南北分化:当前到港呈现南多北少,南方加工需求相对活跃、北方受地产拖累明显,卸货港的选择直接影响变现速度和港口库存成本。第四,趁运费低位谈长约:46美元一方的海运费处于阶段性低位,正是把新西兰至中国航线的季度运价和舱位锁下来的窗口,别等外盘继续上调、运费跟涨时再动手。

外盘连涨而现货不涨,本质是供强需弱下的成本与市场拉锯。对进口商来说,此时比拼的不是谁接货快,而是谁把到岸账算得细、把到港节奏控得稳。

English Version / 英文版

NZ Log Prices Rise for a Third Round, but Chinese Spot Won't Follow: Importers Should Recalculate Landed Cost First

Latest data from Muylian shows October CFR quotes for New Zealand radiata pine logs climbing to USD 132-137 per JAS cubic metre, up USD 4 on the low end and USD 3 on the high end from September, marking a third consecutive round of overseas price increases. Chinese spot markets, however, are not following. At Rizhao port, 3.9m medium-A radiata pine is quoted at RMB 830 per cubic metre, barely higher; at Taicang, 4m medium-A slipped to RMB 820. The benchmark LG2611 futures contract closed at RMB 816.5 on October 21, drifting lower in a rangebound market. The widening gap between rising overseas offers and flat domestic spot prices is eating directly into importer margins.

The root cause is demand. China imported 40.43 million cubic metres of logs and sawn timber in January-September, down 4.1% year on year. September softwood log imports rose 11% to about 2.22 million cubic metres, with arrivals concentrated and New Zealand's share of the import mix continuing to expand. Volumes are recovering but prices are not, because end demand cannot absorb more: August furniture retail sales fell 7.9% year on year, and downstream mills are buying strictly for immediate needs. Nobody is willing to pay up. Inventory tells the same story: as of early October, radiata pine stocks stood at about 1.78 million cubic metres and total softwood log stocks at about 2.38 million. Stocks are drawing down slightly, but not fast enough to keep pace with pulse arrivals, so port-side spot prices lack the footing for a sustained rise.

Pulse-like arrivals amplify the tug-of-war. In the week of October 5-11, 13 vessels carrying about 462,000 cubic metres arrived at 13 Chinese ports, up 58% week on week; the following week arrivals collapsed 38% to 288,000 cubic metres. Actual arrivals in the week of October 12-18 were 11 vessels and 385,000 cubic metres, up another 5%; the week of October 19-25 is forecast at 9 vessels and 346,000 cubic metres, down 10% again. With volumes swinging wildly around the 300,000 cubic metre mark, clustered arrivals crush spot prices while thin weeks let them bounce back. Importers' purchasing and selling rhythm is being dictated by this volatility.

Notably, ocean freight is not the driver this time. Bulk freight for softwood logs from New Zealand to China is USD 46 per JAS cubic metre for early November, flat month on month, and was USD 48 in early October. The cost push comes from the logs themselves, while freight sits at a low, stable level.

For log importers and timber users, we recommend four things. First, run the full landed-cost calculation for every vessel: CFR price, exchange rate, port charges, fumigation and quarantine, and demurrage risk, all weighed against domestic spot prices. If the spread is clearly negative, slow down vessel acceptance. Second, ship in tranches and stagger arrivals: in a pulse-arrival market, avoid having several vessels berthing in the same week and triggering a price stampede. Third, watch the north-south split: arrivals are skewing south, where processing demand is more active, while the north is weighed down by the property downturn. Discharge port choice directly affects how fast inventory converts to cash. Fourth, lock in contracts while freight is cheap: USD 46 per cubic metre is a low point, a good window to fix quarterly rates and space on the New Zealand-China run before overseas quotes rise further and freight follows.

Rising overseas offers against flat spot prices are, at bottom, a standoff between cost-push supply and weak demand. What separates winners now is not who receives cargo fastest, but who calculates landed cost most precisely and controls arrival pacing most steadily.

需要这条航线的运价与舱位方案?
提交起运港与目的港,10 秒获取参考运价,专人跟进未命中航线
立即询价
返回行业洞察