A-Choice
海运价格亚甄研究院 · 2026年10月12日

集装箱船订单堆到船队46%:运价下行周期将至,货主手里多了什么筹码

全球集装箱船新造船订单已达1550万TEU、相当于现有船队的46%,而2027-2028年将迎来交付高峰,拆解却几乎停滞。叠加红海复航加速与美国进口需求见顶,运价中枢的下行周期正在形成。对货主而言,定价权正从船公司回摆,现在正是谈长协的窗口。

集装箱船订单堆到船队46%:运价下行周期将至,货主手里多了什么筹码

黄金周过后的集运市场,表面上风平浪静。截至10月9日,上海出口集装箱综合运价指数收于3664.11点,与节前基本持平;欧洲航线即期运价小幅反弹3.4%至2274美元/TEU,美西、美东则在高位盘整。但行情数字之下,另一组数据更值得货主认真对待:全球集装箱船新造船订单已累计达到1550万TEU,相当于现有全球船队规模的46%。

这个数字意味着什么?据市场机构统计,2027年预计交付约330万TEU新运力,2028年更是高达600万TEU。与新船源源不断下水形成鲜明对照的,是拆解环节几乎停摆:全球目前有1945艘船龄满20年的老旧集装箱船,理论上都到了该退役的年纪,但今年迄今只有13艘被送拆。一边是天文数字的新船订单,一边是本该退休的老船继续满负荷运营,未来两年全球集运运力的增长曲线,其实已经提前画好了。

需求端却给不出对等的支撑。美国全国零售联合会与Hackett Associates联合发布的全球港口追踪报告显示,美国主要港口8月进口约230万TEU,很可能就是全年的顶点;9月、10月预计回落至228万和225万TEU,11月进一步降到200万TEU。跨太平洋这条超长旺季,基本宣告结束。与此同时,红海复航在明显加速:9月通过曼德海峡的集装箱船达到314艘次,创红海危机以来的最高纪录;Premier Alliance已确认将两条亚洲至北欧航线改为东西双向取道红海,其中ONE运营的FE1航线预计11月9日率先西行通过苏伊士。此前绕好望角吸收的约8%至12%运力,正在被逐步释放回市场。

供给增长、需求回落、绕航红利消退,三股力量指向同一个方向:运价中枢的下行周期已经在路上。Xeneta首席分析师Peter Sand的观察印证了这一点——自7月初的高点以来,远东至地中海即期运价已累计下跌43%,北欧下跌34%,跌势虽有放缓但尚未见底。更值得注意的是指数与实际成交之间的落差:市场上已经出现中国至英国港口2650美元/40尺柜的货代报价,明显低于公开指数水平。而在长期合同谈判中,货代的议价地位也在同步改善。

对通过A-Choice发货的货主而言,这个周期的含义非常实际。过去两年,与船司谈长约基本是船司开价;进入下行周期,定价权正在向买方回摆。这里有三条建议。其一,如果你的货量稳定,尤其是欧洲和地中海方向,现在是锁定长协的好窗口,不必等指数再跌才出手——船公司同样知道周期在变,愿意用更低的合同价换取稳定的舱量承诺,等公开价格跌下去再谈,能拿到的让步空间反而更小。其二,合同里的量价弹性要写清楚:货量不及预期时的减量条款、市场继续下跌时的调价机制,都值得提前约定,否则锁价就变成了单方面锁死自己。其三,警惕船司用空班、减速航行、航线并线来对冲运力过剩——低价合同如果换来的是准班率下降、甩柜增多,综合成本未必更省。把准班率等服务指标一并写进合同,比单纯压价更重要。运价的冬天未必马上到来,但筹码,正在流向货主这一边。

English Version / 英文版

Container ship orderbook hits 46% of the global fleet: as the rate downcycle approaches, shippers gain new leverage

The container shipping market looks calm in the week after China's Golden Week. As of October 9, the Shanghai Containerized Freight Index stood at 3,664.11 points, essentially flat versus the pre-holiday level; Asia-Europe spot rates ticked up 3.4% to $2,274 per TEU, while transpacific rates held near their highs. But beneath the weekly numbers, a different set of figures deserves every shipper's attention: the global container ship orderbook has reached 15.5 million TEU, equal to roughly 46% of the entire fleet now in service.

What does that mean in practice? Industry estimates point to about 3.3 million TEU of new capacity delivered in 2027 and as much as 6 million TEU in 2028. In stark contrast, scrapping has almost stopped: there are 1,945 container ships aged 20 years or older in the global fleet — all theoretically due for retirement — yet only 13 have been sent to the breakers this year. A wave of newbuildings on one side, aging tonnage still earning on the other: the growth curve for the industry's capacity over the next two years is already drawn.

Demand cannot offer matching support. The Global Port Tracker published jointly by the NRF and Hackett Associates shows US ports handled about 2.3 million TEU of imports in August — quite possibly the peak of the year — with September and October forecast at 2.28 million and 2.25 million TEU, sliding further to 2 million TEU in November. The unusually long transpacific peak season is effectively over. Meanwhile, the return to the Red Sea is accelerating: 314 container ships transited the Bab el-Mandeb Strait in September, the highest count since the crisis began, and the Premier Alliance has confirmed it will route two Asia-North Europe services through the Red Sea in both directions, with ONE's FE1 service expected to transit the Suez Canal westbound on November 9. The roughly 8-12% of fleet capacity absorbed by Cape of Good Hope diversions is gradually being released back into the market.

Rising supply, cooling demand and a fading diversion premium all point the same way: a freight rate downcycle is taking shape. Peter Sand, chief analyst at Xeneta, confirmed the trend — spot rates from the Far East to the Mediterranean have fallen 43% and to North Europe 34% since their early-July peaks, and while the pace has slowed, the market has yet to find its floor. Equally telling is the gap between published indices and actual transacted prices: forwarders are already quoting as low as $2,650 per 40ft container from China to UK ports, well below index levels. And in long-term contract talks, forwarders and shippers alike are extracting better terms from carriers.

For shippers moving cargo through A-Choice, this cycle has very practical implications. Over the past two years, carriers essentially set the price in contract negotiations; in a downcycle, pricing power swings back to the buyer. Three recommendations. First, if your volumes are stable — especially on Europe and Mediterranean lanes — now is a good window to lock in annual contracts. Carriers understand the cycle too and will trade lower contract rates for committed volumes; waiting for the index to fall further may actually shrink the concessions you can extract. Second, spell out volume and price flexibility in the contract: reduction clauses if volumes fall short, and rate-adjustment mechanisms if the market keeps sliding. Otherwise a fixed price simply locks in your own downside. Third, watch for carriers offsetting overcapacity through blank sailings, slow steaming and service merges — a cheap contract that comes with lower schedule reliability and more rollovers may cost you more overall. Writing service indicators such as on-time performance into the contract matters more than squeezing the rate alone. The winter of freight rates may not arrive tomorrow, but the bargaining chips are already moving to the shipper's side of the table.

需要这条航线的运价与舱位方案?
提交起运港与目的港,10 秒获取参考运价,专人跟进未命中航线
立即询价
返回行业洞察