A-Choice
物流行业亚甄研究院 · 2026年9月29日

美东码头罢工倒计时:36港、4.5万工人或停摆,这四类货主最该做备案

国际码头工人协会与美国海事联盟的主合同将于9月30日到期。若10月1日前未达成协议,美东及墨西哥湾36个港口、约4.5万名码头工人可能全面罢工。截至9月29日,已有54艘集装箱船、约37万TEU运力停靠美东港口,未来7天还有约50万TEU计划抵达。罢工一旦落地,亚洲至美东新订舱将面临大规模跳港或取消,高时效、高货值、高滞港风险及对季节性敏感的货物首当其冲。A-Choice建议相关货主立即启动三类备案:确认在途货物预计到港时间、评估美西/加拿大/空运替代方案、在合同中明确滞箱费与改港费承担口径。

美东码头罢工倒计时:36港、4.5万工人或停摆,这四类货主最该做备案

美东码头工人的主合同将在9月30日午夜到期。国际码头工人协会(ILA)与美国海事联盟(USMX)围绕工资涨幅和港口自动化的谈判至今没有达成协议。如果最后窗口期无法弥合分歧,美东及墨西哥湾沿岸36个主要港口、约4.5万名码头工人可能在10月1日凌晨启动全面罢工。这是该工会自1977年以来首次威胁采取全海岸行动,影响范围从缅因州一直延伸到得克萨斯州。

截至9月29日的行业监测数据,已有54艘集装箱船、约37万TEU的运力停靠在美东港口等待作业,未来7天内还有约90艘船、50万TEU计划抵达。这意味着即便罢工只持续几天,港口也会迅速进入“只进不出”状态,船舶被迫在锚地等待,后续航次大面积跳港或取消。

此次谈判的核心矛盾并不复杂:工会要求六年内涨薪约75%,并明确限制港口自动化;雇主方最新提出的方案是六年内涨薪近50%,同时保留现有自动化条款。双方分歧集中在“钱”和“机器换人”两个问题上。美国白宫已表态不会援引《塔夫特-哈特利法》强制复工,更倾向于让劳资双方继续集体谈判。选举季的政治背景下,政府快速干预的可能性较低。

对货主来说,真正需要关心的是连锁反应。一旦美东码头停摆,亚洲至美东的新订舱会被大量改配、甩柜或取消;已在途的集装箱则面临到港后无法卸船、码头堆场爆满、卡车与铁路接驳瘫痪等问题。参考近年美国港口局部中断后的恢复经验,即便罢工一周,后续清积压也可能需要四到六周。

从A-Choice的货种结构看,有四类货物最该提前做备案。第一类是高时效消费品,例如服装、电子产品,错过销售窗口意味着整批货值大幅折损。第二类是高货值设备与汽车零部件,库存链断裂会直接影响下游产线。第三类是危险品与冷链,这类货物对滞港时间极度敏感,超期可能触发安全与合规风险。第四类是工程大件与项目货,吊装、陆运和堆场资源一旦被占用,改港成本极高。

建议货主现在做三件事。第一,核对所有在途货物的预计到港时间和挂靠码头,优先联系船公司确认10月1日前后航次是否改挂或延误。第二,评估替代路径:时间宽裕的普货可考虑美西港口落地后经铁路或公路中转;高价值或时效性强的货物可提前锁定空运仓位;部分加拿大东部港口也可作为分流选项,但要核算额外的内陆成本。第三,在合同和报价单中明确滞箱费、滞港费、改港费和仓储费的承担口径,避免纠纷发生时各方扯皮。

当前市场已经提前反应。上海航交所最新SCFI美东线报约10,497美元/FEU,处于历史高位;美西与美东价差一度超过3,000美元/FEU,显示市场对美东供应链风险的溢价。无论罢工最终是否落地,这种高位波动本身就值得货主重新评估全年物流预算。

这次事件再次说明,国际物流的瓶颈早已不只是海运段。码头、铁路、卡车、堆场任何一个环节中断,都会把压力传导到整根链条。A-Choice建议有美东出货计划的企业,把未来两周当作“风险窗口期”来管理:不赌单一港口、不留单一方案、不把高敏感货物压在临界时间点上。

English Version / 英文版

U.S. East and Gulf Coast Dockworker Strike Countdown: 36 Ports, 45,000 Workers at Risk — Four Shipper Types Need a Backup Plan Now

The ILA-USMX master contract expires at midnight on September 30. With no agreement yet on wages and port automation, roughly 45,000 dockworkers at 36 U.S. East and Gulf Coast ports could walk off the job early on October 1. It would be the first coast-wide longshore strike since 1977, stretching from Maine to Texas.

As of September 29, industry monitors counted 54 containerships—about 370,000 TEU of capacity—already waiting at East Coast ports, with another 90 vessels and roughly 500,000 TEU due within the next seven days. Even a short stoppage would push terminals into a “vessels in, nothing out” state, forcing ships to anchor offshore and triggering blank sailings or port omissions on following voyages.

The bargaining deadlock is straightforward: the union wants roughly a 75 percent wage increase over six years and firm limits on automation, while the employers’ latest offer is close to 50 percent over six years and keeps current automation language. The White House has said it does not plan to invoke the Taft-Hartley Act to force workers back, preferring collective bargaining. With the election season underway, quick federal intervention looks unlikely.

For shippers, the real concern is the ripple effect. New Asia–U.S. East Coast bookings would be rolled, omitted or cancelled in large numbers, while containers already at sea would face delayed discharge, full terminal yards, and paralysis of truck and rail connections. Experience from partial U.S. port disruptions suggests a one-week strike can take four to six weeks to clear.

Four cargo types should prepare first. First, time-sensitive consumer goods such as apparel and electronics, where missing a selling window sharply erodes value. Second, high-value equipment and automotive parts that feed just-in-time production lines. Third, dangerous goods and refrigerated cargo, which face safety and compliance risks if left in port too long. Fourth, project and oversized cargo, where switching ports involves heavy-lift, special haulage and yard resources that are costly and hard to rearrange at short notice.

A-Choice recommends three immediate steps. First, check ETAs and discharge terminals for all in-transit cargo and confirm with carriers whether sailings around October 1 will be diverted or delayed. Second, evaluate alternatives: general cargo with flexible deadlines can enter via the U.S. West Coast and move inland by rail or truck; high-value or urgent shipments should secure airfreight capacity now; some Canadian East Coast ports can absorb volume, but inland costs must be factored in. Third, make sure contracts and quotations clearly state who bears demurrage, detention, diversion and storage charges.

The market has already priced in risk. SCFI East Coast rates are around $10,497 per FEU, and the West Coast–East Coast spread has exceeded $3,000 per FEU, reflecting a premium for East Coast supply-chain uncertainty. Whether or not the strike happens, that volatility alone justifies a fresh look at annual logistics budgets.

This event is another reminder that logistics bottlenecks are no longer just about the ocean leg. A breakdown at terminals, rail yards or trucking networks propagates pressure through the entire chain. For any shipper with U.S. East Coast exposure, the next two weeks should be treated as a risk window: do not rely on one port, one routing or one deadline for sensitive cargo.

需要这条航线的运价与舱位方案?
提交起运港与目的港,10 秒获取参考运价,专人跟进未命中航线
立即询价
返回行业洞察