A-Choice
海运价格亚甄研究院 · 2026年9月28日

国庆前最后三个工作日:华东港口积压还在清,这批货该走还是该压

全球等泊运力已创 430 万标准箱历史新高,跨太平洋航线冲上年内高位,欧地航线却在连跌两个月。国庆假期前,不同航线的出货决策应该完全不同。

国庆前最后三个工作日:华东港口积压还在清,这批货该走还是该压

连着五场台风过后,华东两大枢纽港的拥堵终于开始退潮,但退得比多数人预期慢。对正在赶国庆前最后一班船的货主来说,现实的问题只有一个:这批货是这几天咬牙发走,还是干脆压到节后。

先看拥堵这本账。台风沙德尔 8 月 27 日至 28 日登陆福建沿海,上海港和宁波舟山港的集装箱码头从 26 日至 29 日停工;宁波此后七天因台风及渔船管制累计关闭 78 小时,上海洋山关闭 54 小时、外高桥 48 小时。到 9 月初,上海港七日平均等泊升到 5.46 天,外高桥部分码头超过 9 天,锚地里一度停着近百艘船等泊位。行业估算两港待消化积压一度达约 40 万标准箱。

压力放到全球尺度看更清楚。Linerlytica 统计全球等泊运力已超过 430 万标准箱,压过此前约 400 万标准箱的峰值,创历史新高,东北亚占 54%。Sea-Intelligence 估算全球集装箱船队 6.6% 的运力正被港口延误吞噬;即便按每月改善 0.5 至 0.6 个百分点的历史最优速度推算,回到 2025 年 6 月低点也需要四到六个月。这不是两周能翻篇的风暴,而是会横跨整个旺季的运力缺口。

值得注意的是,运价并没有跟着一起涨。9 月的市场是双轨的:跨太平洋方向,上海到洛杉矶约每 40 尺柜 7,185 美元,周环比涨约 5%;上海到纽约约 9,587 美元,涨约 3%;Xeneta 数据显示第 35 周亚洲至美西一度比前一周高出 20% 以上。亚欧方向完全相反:上海到鹿特丹约 4,092 美元,周跌 5%;到热那亚约 4,368 美元,周跌 10%。

对主营欧洲、中东、非洲和东南亚方向的货主,这个分化有明确指向。欧地航线是全球主要航线中唯一在拥堵冲击下仍愿意让利的通道,部分船公司已在暗中降价抢货。欧洲线货量若仍锁在上半年签的高价合约里,现在是重新谈判的窗口;按票临时走的货,趁这个价位锁掉一部分第四季度需求,风险收益比相当划算。

要单独提醒中转环节。拥堵正从华东枢纽向中转港外溢,对中东、南亚和东非方向影响最直接:科伦坡港受中东货流转移、深水泊位有限与强风叠加影响,CICT 和 CWIT 两个深水码头的船舶周转最长已达 6 天,码头间转运积压最高 5.3 万标准箱;赫伯罗特已预警 48 至 72 小时延误并出现跳港,Mette Maersk 航次干脆取消挂靠、改到新加坡卸货。走这条通道的货,务必再垫 48 到 72 小时缓冲。

那么这批货该走还是该压,建议分三类处理。第一类,已排定船期且国外客户有明确到货节点的机电设备、建材和超限大件,趁国庆前发走——船期紊乱已延伸到 10 月,等泊缓冲通常比常规船期多三到五天。第二类,欧洲方向没有硬节点的普货可以部分后移,欧地运价仍在下行通道,10 月即期价格大概率不会高于当前。第三类,必须赶上这一水但从宁波出的货要特别注意堆场:梅山等码头堆场密度突破 90% 后,港口已要求船公司把本地出口货甩柜比例控制在 10% 以内。这不是价格问题,是能不能装得上去的问题,务必书面确认甩柜责任。

最后提醒一句:别再用常规船期做备货计划表。7 月全球准班率只有 56.4%,而这个夏天的连续五场台风,是在本就很差的班期上又叠了一轮扰动。合理的做法是从客户要求的到港日倒推,最前面留出至少一周机动量;对工程机械、成套设备这类带安装节点的货,这个余量再放大一倍也不过分。

English Version / 英文版

Three Working Days Before the Golden Week Break: Should This Shipment Go Now or Wait?

Five typhoons in a single summer left East China's two busiest hub ports badly backed up. The backlog is draining now, but far more slowly than most shippers assumed when they first saw the closure notices in late August. With the National Day holiday starting on 1 October, cargo owners face one practical question: push this consignment out in the next few working days, or hold it until after the break.

Start with the congestion ledger. Typhoon Saudel made landfall on the Fujian coast on 27–28 August, closing container terminals at Shanghai and Ningbo-Zhoushan from 26 to 29 August. Ningbo went on to accumulate 78 hours of stoppages over the following week as typhoon controls and fishing-vessel restrictions piled up; Yangshan lost 54 hours and Waigaoqiao 48. By early September Shanghai's seven-day average berth waiting time had reached 5.46 days, with several Waigaoqiao berths above nine days and close to a hundred vessels riding at anchor for a slot. Estimates from the Shanghai International Shipping Institute put the combined backlog awaiting clearance at around 400,000 TEU.

Seen globally, the picture is more sobering. Linerlytica counts more than 4.3 million TEU of vessel capacity waiting for berths worldwide, above the previous 4.0 million peak and a new record, with North East Asia accounting for 54% — roughly 2.5 million TEU. Sea-Intelligence estimates that berth delays are absorbing 6.6% of the global container fleet; even at the best historical recovery pace of 0.5–0.6 percentage points a month, returning to the June 2025 low would take four to six months. In other words, this is not a two-week weather event but a structural capacity gap running through peak season.

What makes September unusual is that rates did not follow congestion higher. The market has split. On the transpacific, Drewry assessed Shanghai–Los Angeles at about $7,185 per 40ft on 3 September, roughly 5% up week on week, and Shanghai–New York at about $9,587, up 3%; Xeneta put Asia–US West Coast above $7,295 per FEU in week 35, more than 20% above the previous week. Asia–Europe ran the other way: Shanghai–Rotterdam around $4,092, down 5%, and Shanghai–Genoa around $4,368, down 10%.

For shippers moving cargo through Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Southeast Asia, that divergence points somewhere specific. Europe and Mediterranean trades are the only major lanes still conceding price in the middle of a congestion shock, and several carriers are quietly discounting to fill ships. If European volumes are still tied to contract rates agreed earlier this year, this is the window to reopen that conversation. If you move cargo spot by spot, locking in part of your fourth-quarter requirement at these levels carries a favourable risk profile.

Transhipment deserves separate attention, because it hits Middle East, South Asia and East Africa routings hardest. Colombo has been squeezed from three sides — diverted Gulf volumes, limited deep-water berths and high winds — pushing vessel turnaround at the CICT and CWIT terminals to as much as six days, with inter-terminal transfer backlogs reported as high as 53,000 TEU. Hapag-Lloyd has warned of 48–72 hour delays and omitted calls, and the Mette Maersk skipped Colombo entirely, discharging at Singapore instead. Add a 48–72 hour buffer to anything routed through that port, and confirm with the consignee in advance whether a change of discharge port is acceptable.

So: ship now, or hold?

Three cases. First, machinery, building materials and out-of-gauge project cargo already booked on a string, where the overseas buyer has a fixed delivery milestone — move it before the holiday. Schedule disruption now extends into October, and waiting converts one layer of uncertainty into two, with berth buffers running three to five days beyond normal. Second, general cargo for Europe without a hard deadline can be partly deferred. Europe-bound rates remain on a downward path, and as the backlog clears and effective capacity returns, October spot levels are unlikely to sit above today's. Third, Ningbo cargo that must sail on the current string needs watching at the yard: after Meishan's yard density passed 90%, the port imposed controls requiring carriers to keep local export shut-out ratios below 10%. That is not a pricing matter but an escalation of whether the box loads at all — have the shut-out liability clause confirmed in writing by whoever books it.

One closing note. Standard transit times should not be your planning baseline right now. Global schedule reliability was 56.4% back in July, and five consecutive typhoons landed on an already weak baseline. Plan backwards from the arrival date your customer requires and leave at least a week of slack in front of it. For project and engineering cargo with installation milestones attached, double that margin.

需要这条航线的运价与舱位方案?
提交起运港与目的港,10 秒获取参考运价,专人跟进未命中航线
立即询价
返回行业洞察